Varieties of deprivation S2

condition	n	percentage
poor	99	33.00%
middle_class	100	33.33%
rich	101	33.67%

blame_pre

Q1: Blame (pre-backstory) that David deserves for his actions [0 = No blame at all, 6 = A lot of blame]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	blame_pre	99	5.859	0.452	0.045	0.090
middle_class	blame_pre	100	5.830	0.533	0.053	0.106
rich	blame_pre	101	5.842	0.731	0.073	0.144

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: blame_pre
##            Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   0.041   2  0.0601 0.9417
## Residuals 101.596 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 4.05e-04 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.02 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.731	ns	1	ns	0.0578	-0.23	0.35	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.837	ns	1	ns	0.0279	-0.33	0.26	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.888	ns	1	ns	-0.0181	-0.34	0.21	negligible

punish_pre

Q2: Punishment (pre-backstory) that David deserves for his actions [0 = No punishment at all, 6 = Severe punishment]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	punish_pre	99	5.293	0.848	0.085	0.169
middle_class	punish_pre	100	5.380	0.862	0.086	0.171
rich	punish_pre	101	5.366	0.821	0.082	0.162

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: punish_pre
##            Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   0.436   2  0.3062 0.7365
## Residuals 211.511 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 2.06e-03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.05 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.467	ns	1	ns	-0.1018	-0.37	0.18	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.539	ns	1	ns	-0.0879	-0.36	0.19	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.909	ns	1	ns	0.0162	-0.27	0.29	negligible

manip_check

Q3: How financially secure David was during his childhood (manipulation check) [0 = very insecure, 6 = very secure]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	manip_check	99	0.111	0.426	0.043	0.085
middle_class	manip_check	100	3.850	1.104	0.110	0.219
rich	manip_check	101	5.901	0.458	0.046	0.090

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: manip_check
##            Sum Sq  Df F value    Pr(>F)    
## condition 1720.25   2  1601.2 < 2.2e-16 ***
## Residuals  159.54 297                      
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.92 | [0.90, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      3.28 | [3.04, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p.signif	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	****	****	-4.4587	-5.63	-3.72	large
poor	rich	99	101	****	****	-13.0814	-21.87	-9.74	large
middle_class	rich	100	101	****	****	-2.4300	-3.06	-1.99	large

blame_post

Q4: Blame (post-backstory) that David deserves for his actions [0 = No blame at all, 6 = A lot of blame]

Summary

condition	time	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	blame_pre	blame	99	5.859	0.452	0.045	0.090
poor	blame_post	blame	99	5.323	1.132	0.114	0.226
middle_class	blame_pre	blame	100	5.830	0.533	0.053	0.106
middle_class	blame_post	blame	100	5.240	0.976	0.098	0.194
rich	blame_pre	blame	101	5.842	0.731	0.073	0.144
rich	blame_post	blame	101	5.426	1.023	0.102	0.202

ANOVA

# Mixed model

res.aov <- anova_test(
  data = df2, dv = blame, wid = id,
  between = condition, within = time
  )
get_anova_table(res.aov)

## ANOVA Table (type III tests)
## 
##           Effect DFn DFd      F        p p<.05   ges
## 1      condition   2 297  0.477 6.21e-01       0.002
## 2           time   1 297 98.240 3.42e-20     * 0.085
## 3 condition:time   2 297  0.990 3.73e-01       0.002

one.way <- df2 %>%
  group_by(time) %>%
  anova_test(dv = blame, wid = id, between = condition) %>%
  get_anova_table() %>%
  adjust_pvalue(method = "bonferroni")
one.way

## # A tibble: 2 × 9
##   time       Effect      DFn   DFd     F     p `p<.05`      ges p.adj
##   <fct>      <chr>     <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr>      <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 blame_pre  condition     2   297 0.06  0.942 ""      0.000405 1    
## 2 blame_post condition     2   297 0.796 0.452 ""      0.005    0.904

# Pairwise comparisons between group levels
pwc <- df2 %>%
  group_by(time) %>%
  pairwise_t_test(blame ~ condition, p.adjust.method = "bonferroni")
pwc

## # A tibble: 6 × 10
##   time       .y.   group1   group2    n1    n2     p p.signif p.adj p.adj.signif
## * <fct>      <chr> <chr>    <chr>  <int> <int> <dbl> <chr>    <dbl> <chr>       
## 1 blame_pre  blame poor     middl…    99   100 0.731 ns       1     ns          
## 2 blame_pre  blame poor     rich      99   101 0.837 ns       1     ns          
## 3 blame_pre  blame middle_… rich     100   101 0.888 ns       1     ns          
## 4 blame_post blame poor     middl…    99   100 0.575 ns       1     ns          
## 5 blame_post blame poor     rich      99   101 0.489 ns       1     ns          
## 6 blame_post blame middle_… rich     100   101 0.209 ns       0.627 ns

# Effect of time at each level of exercises group
one.way2 <- df2 %>%
  group_by(condition) %>%
  anova_test(dv = blame, wid = id, within = time) %>%
  get_anova_table() %>%
  adjust_pvalue(method = "bonferroni")
one.way2

## # A tibble: 3 × 9
##   condition    Effect   DFn   DFd     F             p `p<.05`   ges        p.adj
##   <fct>        <chr>  <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>         <dbl> <chr>   <dbl>        <dbl>
## 1 poor         time       1    98  30.0 0.000000331   *       0.089      9.93e-7
## 2 middle_class time       1    99  44.1 0.00000000171 *       0.125      5.13e-9
## 3 rich         time       1   100  25.5 0.00000201    *       0.052      6.03e-6

# Pairwise comparisons between time points at each group levels
# Paired t-test is used because we have repeated measures by time
pwc2 <- df2 %>%
group_by(condition) %>%
  pairwise_t_test(
    blame ~ time, paired = TRUE, 
    p.adjust.method = "bonferroni"
    ) %>%
  dplyr::select(-statistic, -p) # Remove details
pwc2

## # A tibble: 3 × 9
##   condition    .y.   group1    group2        n1    n2    df   p.adj p.adj.signif
##   <fct>        <chr> <chr>     <chr>      <int> <int> <dbl>   <dbl> <chr>       
## 1 poor         blame blame_pre blame_post    99    99    98 3.31e-7 ****        
## 2 middle_class blame blame_pre blame_post   100   100    99 1.71e-9 ****        
## 3 rich         blame blame_pre blame_post   101   101   100 2.01e-6 ****

Plots & Comparisons

punish_post

Q5: Punishment (post-backstory) that David deserves for his actions [0 = No punishment at all, 6 = Severe punishment]

Summary

condition	time	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	punish_pre	punish	99	5.293	0.848	0.085	0.169
poor	punish_post	punish	99	4.838	1.193	0.120	0.238
middle_class	punish_pre	punish	100	5.380	0.862	0.086	0.171
middle_class	punish_post	punish	100	4.990	1.030	0.103	0.204
rich	punish_pre	punish	101	5.366	0.821	0.082	0.162
rich	punish_post	punish	101	5.099	0.985	0.098	0.194

ANOVA

# Mixed model

res.aov <- anova_test(
  data = df3, dv = punish, wid = id,
  between = condition, within = time
  )
get_anova_table(res.aov)

## ANOVA Table (type III tests)
## 
##           Effect DFn DFd      F        p p<.05   ges
## 1      condition   2 297  0.939 3.92e-01       0.005
## 2           time   1 297 71.103 1.49e-15     * 0.036
## 3 condition:time   2 297  1.564 2.11e-01       0.002

one.way <- df3 %>%
  group_by(time) %>%
  anova_test(dv = punish, wid = id, between = condition) %>%
  get_anova_table() %>%
  adjust_pvalue(method = "bonferroni")
one.way

## # A tibble: 2 × 9
##   time        Effect      DFn   DFd     F     p `p<.05`   ges p.adj
##   <fct>       <chr>     <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr>   <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 punish_pre  condition     2   297 0.306 0.736 ""      0.002 1    
## 2 punish_post condition     2   297 1.49  0.227 ""      0.01  0.454

# Pairwise comparisons between group levels
pwc <- df3 %>%
  group_by(time) %>%
  pairwise_t_test(punish ~ condition, p.adjust.method = "bonferroni")
pwc

## # A tibble: 6 × 10
##   time        .y.   group1 group2    n1    n2      p p.signif p.adj p.adj.signif
## * <fct>       <chr> <chr>  <chr>  <int> <int>  <dbl> <chr>    <dbl> <chr>       
## 1 punish_pre  puni… poor   middl…    99   100 0.467  ns       1     ns          
## 2 punish_pre  puni… poor   rich      99   101 0.539  ns       1     ns          
## 3 punish_pre  puni… middl… rich     100   101 0.909  ns       1     ns          
## 4 punish_post puni… poor   middl…    99   100 0.319  ns       0.958 ns          
## 5 punish_post puni… poor   rich      99   101 0.0867 ns       0.26  ns          
## 6 punish_post puni… middl… rich     100   101 0.472  ns       1     ns

# Effect of time at each level of exercises group
one.way2 <- df3 %>%
  group_by(condition) %>%
  anova_test(dv = punish, wid = id, within = time) %>%
  get_anova_table() %>%
  adjust_pvalue(method = "bonferroni")
one.way2

## # A tibble: 3 × 9
##   condition    Effect   DFn   DFd     F           p `p<.05`   ges       p.adj
##   <fct>        <chr>  <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>       <dbl> <chr>   <dbl>       <dbl>
## 1 poor         time       1    98  25.5 0.00000203  *       0.046 0.00000609 
## 2 middle_class time       1    99  31.5 0.000000181 *       0.041 0.000000543
## 3 rich         time       1   100  15.8 0.000135    *       0.021 0.000405

# Pairwise comparisons between time points at each group levels
# Paired t-test is used because we have repeated measures by time
pwc2 <- df3 %>%
group_by(condition) %>%
  pairwise_t_test(
    punish ~ time, paired = TRUE, 
    p.adjust.method = "bonferroni"
    ) %>%
  dplyr::select(-statistic, -p) # Remove details
pwc2

## # A tibble: 3 × 9
##   condition    .y.    group1     group2      n1    n2    df   p.adj p.adj.signif
##   <fct>        <chr>  <chr>      <chr>    <int> <int> <dbl>   <dbl> <chr>       
## 1 poor         punish punish_pre punish_…    99    99    98 2.03e-6 ****        
## 2 middle_class punish punish_pre punish_…   100   100    99 1.81e-7 ****        
## 3 rich         punish punish_pre punish_…   101   101   100 1.35e-4 ***

Plots & Comparisons

surprise

Q7: Surprise after learning of David’s criminal behavior [0=Not surprised at all, 6=Extremely surprised]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	surprise	99	2.273	1.671	0.168	0.333
middle_class	surprise	100	2.440	1.572	0.157	0.312
rich	surprise	101	2.228	1.708	0.170	0.337

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: surprise
##           Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   2.51   2  0.4598 0.6319
## Residuals 810.04 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 3.09e-03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.06 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.476	ns	1	ns	-0.1031	-0.40	0.18	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.847	ns	1	ns	0.0266	-0.23	0.30	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.363	ns	1	ns	0.1293	-0.13	0.40	negligible

character

Q8: David’s moral character [0 = Very immoral, 6= Very moral]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	character	99	2.354	1.264	0.127	0.252
middle_class	character	100	2.210	1.225	0.123	0.243
rich	character	101	1.851	1.252	0.125	0.247

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: character
##           Sum Sq  Df F value  Pr(>F)  
## condition  13.41   2  4.3099 0.01429 *
## Residuals 461.99 297                  
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.17 | [0.06, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.4180	ns	0.4180	ns	0.1153	-0.1600	0.41	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.0047	**	0.0142	*	0.3991	0.1300	0.67	small
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.0425	*	0.0850	ns	0.2894	0.0084	0.59	small

wrongness

Q9: Wrongness of David’s actions [0 = Not wrong at all, 6 = Extremely wrong]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	wrongness	99	5.576	0.834	0.084	0.166
middle_class	wrongness	100	5.720	0.683	0.068	0.135
rich	wrongness	101	5.752	0.767	0.076	0.151

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: wrongness
##            Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   1.763   2   1.512 0.2222
## Residuals 173.154 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.01 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.10 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.184	ns	0.368	ns	-0.1893	-0.45	0.11	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.103	ns	0.309	ns	-0.2207	-0.52	0.07	small
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.763	ns	0.763	ns	-0.0447	-0.36	0.21	negligible

justification

Q10: Justifiability of David’s actions [0 = Not justifiable at all, 6 = Completely justifiable]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	justification	99	0.646	1.232	0.124	0.246
middle_class	justification	100	0.680	1.286	0.129	0.255
rich	justification	101	0.436	1.004	0.100	0.198

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: justification
##           Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   3.53   2  1.2681 0.2829
## Residuals 413.22 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 8.47e-03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.09 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.841	ns	0.841	ns	-0.0266	-0.30	0.27	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.207	ns	0.429	ns	0.1878	-0.11	0.47	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.143	ns	0.429	ns	0.2119	-0.06	0.48	small

reasons

Q11: Agreement with David having good reasons for his actions [0 = Definitely not, 6 = Definitely yes]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	reasons	99	1.081	1.536	0.154	0.306
middle_class	reasons	100	1.310	1.656	0.166	0.329
rich	reasons	101	1.020	1.463	0.146	0.289

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: reasons
##           Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   4.69   2  0.9723 0.3794
## Residuals 716.70 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 6.51e-03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.08 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.299	ns	0.598	ns	-0.1435	-0.40	0.14	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.781	ns	0.781	ns	0.0407	-0.23	0.29	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.186	ns	0.558	ns	0.1858	-0.07	0.46	negligible

guilt

Q12: Agreement with David experiencing guilt about his actions [0 = Not at all, 6 = Extremely]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	guilt	99	4.253	1.710	0.172	0.341
middle_class	guilt	100	4.470	1.446	0.145	0.287
rich	guilt	101	3.525	1.787	0.178	0.353

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: guilt
##           Sum Sq  Df F value    Pr(>F)    
## condition  49.30   2  9.0065 0.0001594 ***
## Residuals 812.78 297                      
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.06 | [0.02, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.25 | [0.14, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.3550	ns	0.3550	ns	-0.1374	-0.42	0.13	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.0021	**	0.0041	**	0.4160	0.15	0.71	small
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.0001	****	0.0002	***	0.5814	0.31	0.86	moderate

SFC

Q13: Agreement with David having chosen to have his moral character [0 = Not at all, 6 = Extremely]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	SFC	99	2.990	1.488	0.150	0.297
middle_class	SFC	100	3.460	1.480	0.148	0.294
rich	SFC	101	3.406	1.478	0.147	0.292

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: SFC
##           Sum Sq  Df F value  Pr(>F)  
## condition  13.16   2  2.9966 0.05147 .
## Residuals 652.19 297                  
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.02 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.14 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.026	*	0.078	ns	-0.3168	-0.61	-0.060	small
poor	rich	99	101	0.048	*	0.096	ns	-0.2806	-0.57	0.003	small
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.796	ns	0.796	ns	0.0366	-0.25	0.340	negligible

CF

Q14: Agreement with David’s moral character determined by the circumstances of his childhood [0 = Not at all, 6 = Extremely]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	CF	99	3.909	1.341	0.135	0.267
middle_class	CF	100	3.870	1.405	0.140	0.279
rich	CF	101	3.802	1.407	0.140	0.278

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: CF
##           Sum Sq  Df F value Pr(>F)
## condition   0.59   2  0.1535 0.8578
## Residuals 569.53 297               
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter |     Eta2 |       95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition | 1.03e-03 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.03 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.842	ns	1	ns	0.0285	-0.25	0.30	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.585	ns	1	ns	0.0779	-0.21	0.35	negligible
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.728	ns	1	ns	0.0484	-0.23	0.34	negligible

SE

Q15: Agreement with David’s behavior reflecting his moral character [0 = Not at all, 6 = Extremely]

Summary

condition	variable	n	mean	sd	se	ci
poor	SE	99	3.727	1.456	0.146	0.290
middle_class	SE	100	3.620	1.324	0.132	0.263
rich	SE	101	4.030	1.300	0.129	0.257

ANOVA

## $output1
## Anova Table (Type II tests)
## 
## Response: SE
##           Sum Sq  Df F value  Pr(>F)  
## condition   9.08   2   2.451 0.08795 .
## Residuals 550.11 297                  
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## $output2
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Eta2 |       95% CI
## -------------------------------
## condition | 0.02 | [0.00, 1.00]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [1.00].
## $output3
## # Effect Size for ANOVA
## 
## Parameter | Cohen's f |      95% CI
## -----------------------------------
## condition |      0.13 | [0.00, Inf]
## 
## - One-sided CIs: upper bound fixed at [Inf].

Plots & Comparisons

group1	group2	n1	n2	p	p.signif	p.adj	p.adj.signif	effsize	conf.low	conf.high	Cohens’ d
poor	middle_class	99	100	0.5790	ns	0.5790	ns	0.0771	-0.22	0.36	negligible
poor	rich	99	101	0.1170	ns	0.2340	ns	-0.2193	-0.52	0.03	small
middle_class	rich	100	101	0.0337	*	0.1011	ns	-0.3123	-0.61	-0.04	small

Varieties of deprivation S2

Date of study: 10 Nov 2024. Last compiled on 27 November, 2024

Valid entries and size of groups

Effect of condition on DVs (ANOVAs)

blame_pre

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

punish_pre

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

manip_check

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

blame_post

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

punish_post

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

surprise

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

character

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

wrongness

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

justification

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

reasons

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

guilt

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

SFC

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

CF

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

SE

Summary

ANOVA

Plots & Comparisons

Effect of condition on DVs (Regression)

Effect of manip_check on DVs